The Cancer Industry
















The images above show the most common methods of treating cancer using conventional treatment, surgery, radiation and the dreaded chemotherapy. Would I want chemotherapy drugs pumped into MY body or receive radiation which will affect tissue, organs and bone surrounding the target area? NOT a chance. Radiation therapy (xrays) were used as far back as the 1920's and 30's







































What is this "Cancer Industry" I am talking about? First, lets consider what is an "industry." An industry is defined as the manufacturing and sale of a product or the promotion and sale of a service. The Cancer Society and the oncologists provide both. Oncologists provide the service of finding cancer and then selecting a treatment, usually chemotherapy and/or radiation and in some cases, surgery to remove a tumour or cancerous body parts such as prostate, hysterectomies and tumours in places like the colon. Pharmaceutical companies provide the chemotherapy drugs which are very expensive and in my opinion very dangerous as they kill the immune system. Plus a study done in Australia found that chemo drugs were only 2.3% affective in Australia and 2.1% in the U.S. I think I'd want WAY better odds than that for MY cancer treatment.


Here is a link to a page that a poll of oncologist who said they would NOT take chemotherapy or would have to give it serious thought. These are the same people who think nothing of injecting people with chemo poison as a way to treat (notice I didn't say cure) cancer.


Just about everyone knows someone, maybe even a family member, or knows someone who has lost a friend or loved one to cancer. What happens when you are diagnosed with cancer? Depending on what type of cancer it is treatment options are presented to you. If you are like most people you will put your faith and trust in your oncologist because he is the expert in all things dealing with cancer. Right?


The Cancer Society has existed for about 80 years in Canada (1938) and over a hundred years (1913) in the U.S.A. The only method of treating cancer at that time was surgery. If the cancer was not operable then it was a death sentence. Starting in the 1940's chemotherapy drugs started to be used extensively. The first was Nitrogen Mustard, a derivitave of mustard gas. Some results were to be had using this primitive chemotherapy drug. Since then we have many different types of chemotherapy drugs. They are all designed to basically do the same thing; to attack fast growing cancer cells and hopefully poison them out of existance. There is a problem with this as chemotherapy will also attack parts of the body that also has fast growing cells such as stomach lining, stress on the kidneys and liver, hair loss, mouth sores and the list goes on. Chemo will not work on some cancers such as prostate cancer because prostate cancer cells grow very slowly over years and since chemo only works on fast growing cancer cells it is not used in this instance.


An Australian study found that chemotherapy was only 2.3 percent affective in Australia and 2.1 percent affective in the U.S.A. These findings were so shocking at the time (2003) that Australia was considering not covering chemotherapy drugs because of their abysmal success (or lack of). Click here to see this report.


To learn more about the dangers and inaffectiveness of chemotherapy click here to read this information. And here is another site that is more formal explaining this.


You are probably asking yourself why they keep using chemotherapy drugs if they are so inaffective. The answer is simple. This is where the "industry" part comes into play. Billions of dollars are made by the pharmaceutical companies from the sale of these drugs. Does the Cancer Society REALLY want to find a cure? The final answer is "no." If a cure was found the Cancer Industry would collapse. There would be no need for any other treatment. Oncologists would find their patient load greatly reduced. Cancer wards would be scalled down or disappear altogether. The Cancer Industries "cash cow" would disappear.


Here is proof positive the oncologists KNOW about ketones. When I went to see my urologist I asked him if he knew that cancer cells cannot use ketones and he said, "Yes, I know that." So they KNOW but they are not using this information to cure cancer like the Ketogenic Anti-Cancer Diet does. I was floored when he told me that. I am still shaking my head in disbelief. A bit of searching DID reveal something. There is a pharmaceutical company that is working on this and attempting to create a laboratory synthesis for ketones but that will not work. Why? Because if they succeed in making a pill or a drug to introduce ketone bodies into someones system, what about all the glucose that is in the persons bloodstream feeding the cancer cells? Just simply adding ketone bodies in someone will not do the trick. You HAVE to change your diet to stop the natural creation of glucose. I don't care how much ketones that will be in their drug, the glucose in the body will keep feeding the cancer cells.


You will never see an alternative cancer treatment promoted by oncologists no matter how good it is. Most alternative cancer treatments are derived from natural sources. You cannot patent a natural treatment. Why does the cancer industry ignore these alternative treatments or protocols as they are often referred to? The answer is simple. There is no money to be made from their use and promotion. Yes that's right. Its a matter of profit. There is a huge profit to be made from treating cancer using conventional means. Now, do you REALLY believe that a cure for cancer will be found by the cancer industry? Not a chance. Here is a link that explains this after a Canadian research lab tested dichloroacetate (DCA) and found it a promising treatment for cancer. This is a copy/paste from that web site:


"The medical mafia has created a matrix that demands big bucks to make big bucks for sick care instead of curing. Everyone in on the scam makes out financially. The cancer industry accuses alternative cancer therapists of quackery and taking advantage of the desperately ill for financial gain."


There are web sites out there that promote "natural" cancer cures if you are willing to buy their product. Some of these are reasonably priced and some are expensive. Most people that I know in the alternative cancer cure field DO NOT charge for their protocols or try to make you buy anything. I and many others like me are trying to get the message across that NATURAL protocols like the Ketogenic Anti-Cancer Diet work far better and have way less harmful side affects (none actually) and will not damage the body like chemo or radiation.


The Cancer Society publishes numbers of cancer survivors from time to time. These figures are skewed somewhat when I show you how the stats are done. The Cancer Society uses a five year survivability as a measure of success. Even if you die from cancer after the five years you are still counted as a success story. Quite often the cause of death is written down as something other than cancer. One of the causes of cancer death was listed as "a failure to thrive." Give me a break! Also as soon as you are diagnosed with cancer you are listed in the stats as a cancer survivor. You have cancer and are still living therefore a survivor. This is a spinoff of early detection methods. The Cancer Society is very good at advertising the odd success story but you never hear about the majority that didn't survive.


It is a popular misconception that the phrase "First do no harm" (Latin: Primum non nocere) is a part of the Hippocratic oath. Strictly speaking, the phrase does not appear in the oath, though an equivalent phrase is found in Epidemics, Book I, of the Hippocratic school: "Practise two things in your dealings with disease: either help or do not harm the patient". The exact phrase is believed to have originated with the 19th-century surgeon Thomas Inman. Fast forward to today. Do you think that injecting chemo drugs and exposing people to radiation does no harm? Sure it does as anyone who has survived cancer by conventional means or knows someone that has. The damage done to the body is severe. Chemo drugs completely destroy the immune system and radiation can affect tissue, bones and organs surrounding the target area. Its almost guaranteed that cancer will reappear months or years later in the same place or another area of the body.


Here is a good site explaining why a cure for cancer will never be found or will be withheld from the public. Just follow the money trail they say if you want the truth. Click here.


I know I am probably dreaming but I look forward to the day when the Cancer Society and the pharmaceutical companies are charged with malpractice and not using treatments that actually work. We are talking about peoples lives. As it stands no treatment will get any look unless it has the probability of making a profit for the cancer industry. It makes you wonder how many other groups are in on the action. I really wish SOMEONE with deep pockets (it will take a LOT of money) take the Cancer Society and the pharmaceuticals (often referred to as "Big Pharma") into court. I can dream can't I?